The Language of Power: Owen Jones

Il giovane britannico, giornalista e opinionista politico, è autore di due importanti saggi in cui analizza il ruolo coesivo del linguaggio nella società al di là della divisione di classe.

Bandera UK
Sarah Davison

Speaker (UK accent)

Aggiornato il giorno

466 The Language of Power freeimage

Ascolta questo articolo

Stampare

The relationship between language and power is a close one. While complicated language was once used to confuse and intimidate, more recently, simpler language is assumed to be the key component in capturing voters. Political scientists, for example, have long believed that populists, from Donald Trump to Marine Le Pen, use easier language to appeal to ordinary people and distance themselves from elites. 

HOW SIMPLE IS IT

However, a study published in Cambridge University Press in 2020 has come to an unexpected conclusion. It compared the language of right-wing populists active in recent years in the United States, France, United Kingdom and Italy to that of their main opponents. Approximately one million words from leaders’ speeches were analysed using a series of linguistic measures for evaluating simplicity that included sentence length and structure, as well as choice of vocabulary. 

LONG MESSAGES

Surprisingly, it was found that the language of Donald Trump was only slightly simpler than that of Hillary Clinton, and much more complex than that of US President Joe Biden. It found right-wing populist figures Nigel Farage in the UK and Marine Le Pen in France used language that was more difficult than that of their main rivals, with Farage in particular speaking in very long sentences. Italy’s Matteo Salvini was a mixed bag: simpler on some measures but not on others. Given these findings, what is it really about such right-wing populists that attracts support? And what is it about the opposition on the left that is failing to get its message across?

the language

THE ESTABLISHMENT

The language of power is one area that is examined in Owen Jones’ bestselling non-fiction books. Born in Sheffield in the UK, Jones worked as a trade union and parliamentary researcher before becoming a prominent author, political columnist and podcaster. His books aim to demystify politics for ordinary Britons. In Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class and the subsequent The Establishment: And How They Get Away With It, Jones shows how an elite minority of wealthy people misuse politics to hold on to their privilege. While both books were about Britain, they touched a nerve across Europe and were international successes. 

WHAT IS AUSTERITY? 

Jones argues that politicians on the left assume that the public understand issues when they don’t. Political jargon and buzzwords are ubiquitous in politics and the press but often confuse the public, he says. In the run-up to the UK elections in 2017, for example, years after the economic crisis occurred, the most googled question in the UK during a televised debate was still “What is austerity?” When Speak Up met with Jones, he began by explaining why accessibility is key to communication. 

Owen Jones (English accent): I think the left is often very bad at communicating and we communicate in a way that only appeals to people who already are on the left. I find the left often communicate in a very abstract theoretical manner. George Lakoff is a political linguist in America and he says the right often use stories when they talk and the left use facts and statistics. But we are human beings and we empathise, we don’t think about facts and statistics. So, it’s about reaching people who aren’t intellectually-minded middle class lefties. What I’m trying to get across is the ideas of who has power and wealth, who runs society, the injustices that define our societies... to make that easily understood to people.

PROPAGANDA

Stories, however, need to also be based on fact. Right-wing parties thrive on divisive narratives designed to convince people that what is good for the rich few is good for them, too. Right-wing media and social media help spread this disinformation, says Jones.

Owen Jones: The media should be informing people and educating them but often they’re just a big tool of propaganda and they are trying to achieve political ends. In Britain, for example, on average people think 27 per cent of social security is lost to fraud, [but in fact] it’s only 0.7 per cent. They think there are far more immigrants than there are, they think there are twenty times more teenage pregnancies than there are... We’re told we have a free press but instead the media is run by a very small group of very rich people and it’s in their interests to defend the status quo. And they ignore people or demonise them or humiliate them and they distort people’s perceptions of the world.

COMMON CAUSE

Most people believe in justice, which is why they take offence when they read about people who apparently cheat19 the system. But progressive politics is all about fair play, says Jones. People must realise that whatever differences there are between them and their neighbours, they are a lot smaller than those that separate them from the powerful few.

Owen Jones: For me it’s always been a case of how do you find common cause. And it’s about building coalitions, it’s about having debates and discussions where we accept that our strategies and ideas won’t always be the same, but that we always find and emphasise the common causes that we have. Whether you see yourself as working class or middle class, you’ve got the same interests: you want a good job that pays properly, that has good conditions, that has good rights, including a pension. You want good services like education and health. And I think you’re on a collision course with those at the top of society, who concentrate wealth in very few hands. They don’t want to pay their taxes. It’s in their interests to pay people less, to take away their pensions, to privatise public services and run them for profit. We’re all suffering from the greed of those who are in power.  

 

01 Speak Up 466  ITA

Questo articolo appartiene al numero january 2024 della rivista Speak Up.

More in C1 Advanced

A History of Swearing in English
iStock

Language

A History of Swearing in English

I professori e gli studiosi di lingue in genere non ne parlano, ma le parolacce sono una parte centrale del linguaggio. La loro evoluzione e il potere che esercitano svelano degli aspetti nascosti di chi le pronuncia.

Sarah Presant Collins

Jhumpa Lahiri: In Other Words
Free image

Culture

Jhumpa Lahiri: In Other Words

La riconosciuta autrice americana di origini indiane alterna la scrittura all’insegnamento e alla traduzione di opere letterarie in italiano, lingua della quale si è innamorata ed ha scelto come strumento di espressione dopo tanti anni di studio e di ricerca.

Valentina Mercuri

More in Explore

TODAY’S TOP STORIES

A History of Swearing in English
iStock

Language

A History of Swearing in English

I professori e gli studiosi di lingue in genere non ne parlano, ma le parolacce sono una parte centrale del linguaggio. La loro evoluzione e il potere che esercitano svelano degli aspetti nascosti di chi le pronuncia.

Sarah Presant Collins